Categories
Episodes

Wigs

Today we’re learning about hair that’s larger than life! In the past, rich and powerful folks have used their hair to show off how great they were–but all that hair power comes with a price. We talk to Emma Markiewicz about hair and big wigs on today’s episode.

Before you listen to the episode, scroll down to see some truly amazing wigs.

Guest bio: Emma Markiewicz

Emma originally trained as an archaeologist, and worked on excavations all over the world helping improve our knowledge of the past through investigating the sites and artefacts left behind by ancient civilisations. Through this work she became very interested in the material culture of past societies, and especially in thinking about how parts of the body can be turned into objects. She started researching for her PhD on Hair, Wigs and Wig Wearing in Eighteenth-Century England, which took her to archives all over England. She currently works at The National Archives (UK) in Kew, London, where she is responsible for delivering funded programmes, training and guidance to archives organisations of all shapes and sizes. Emma loves working with organisations which look after records and make them accessible to everyone, and remains fascinated by hair and what it can tell us about ideas of beauty and how people managed their health and appearance. 

Transcript

MAGGIE:
You know how every time I take a shower, my hair gets all tangley. And then you make me brush it and it hurts and it takes forever to get the tangles out.

ABBY:
Yes, I do. My mother made me do exactly the same thing. Both you and I have hair that tends to get really tangley really easily.

MAGGIE:
Wouldn’t be nice if you could just keep your hair from getting tangley or once you’ve made it look nice, it just stayed that way?

ABBY:
Well, the only way I can think of is if you didn’t use your own hair. You could wear a wig.

MAGGIE:
I don’t really think that’s something I’d like.

ABBY:
Yeah, me neither, though I do know some folks who can seriously rock a wig. But did you know that in the past, people who were wealthy or powerful sometimes wore wigs that were way bigger than their real hair? And they did it as a way to show everyone that they were wealthy and powerful.

MAGGIE:
That’s kind of weird. So I think we should talk more about this on today’s episode of

MAGGIE AND ABBY: Big if True.

MAGGIE:
Where I, Maggie,

ABBY:
and I, Abby,

MAGGIE:
explore the truth about big things. Today we’re going to learn about a lot of very strange ways to do your hair. So here’s our quiz question to test your knowledge

ABBY:
In the 16 and 1700s, which of these techniques was not used in the process of making a wig?

MAGGIE:
A. combing, B. sewing, C. baking or D. they’re all used.

ABBY:
We’ll tell you the answer near the end of the show.

MAGGIE::
Our guest today knows a lot about wigs and why people wore them. She especially studies men’s wigs. Before we start though, you should take a look at our show notes to see the pictures of the kinds of wigs we’re talking about. If you’ve never seen them before, they’re kind of hard to imagine. You can find them at bigiftrue.abbymullen.org/wigs.

MARKIEWICZ:
My name is Emma Markiewicz. And I work at the National Archives in England. I also did a PhD in history which focused on hair and wigs and wig wearing in 18th century England.

MAGGIE:
What are wigs?

MARKIEWICZ:
What are wigs, I think that wigs are really a means of replacing a whole head of hair with some false hair. So that you can try and change the shape and the style and the color of what’s on your head. They can be made from real human hair belonging to other people. Or they could actually even be made from your own hair as well. They could be made from animal hair, like horse or goat. And of course, in modern times, they can be made from synthetic materials as well like nylon.

MAGGIE:
What are wigs for?

MARKIEWICZ:
So I think really, they had several different functions; they still do. And that could be if you want to replace your own hair, because perhaps you’ve lost your hair, or it’s not the quality you would like it to be. So there’s a sort of real physical use for them there. But also to transform your appearance. So you can put a wig on and you can become somebody else very, very quickly and very, very easily. I also think from the 18th century perspective, there was another function and that was really often to make everybody feel like they belonged to the same group. So what we see quite commonly, particularly in things like the professions, so if you’re a doctor or a lawyer, or a judge, you might wear a wig to show very clearly that you’re part of that group. Similarly, politicians, so very sort of men have very high status would all wear wigs that looked strikingly similar to each other. And I think that a lot of that is to show that they were they were belonging in that group. And that was their status. And that was their place in society. And if they all look the same, then they’ve got strength in numbers. And it’s very clear what they do and what therefore they have a real purpose.

MAGGIE:
When were wigs fashionable?

MARKIEWICZ:
I mean, wigs, really, they come in and out of fashion, all through history. And even today, we see people still wearing wigs. Often we also see people wearing hair pieces or hair extensions. So for the whole of time, I think people have worn false hair in some way or another. For the period that I studied in particular, that was the 18th century. So that really went from the time when King Charles II came on to the throne in England around about 1660. And it said that he spent a lot of his younger years in France where it was very fashionable in the court in the court of the French King to wear great big wigs to show your power and your status. And he came back to take the throne of England and he brought them with him. And they got picked up quite quickly by the upper echelons of society. And then they became very, very popular, particularly amongst men for the first part of that century, and perhaps started to fall out of fashion in the later part. So around about 1760, perhaps around them, finally sort of really coming to an end at the very end of the century, roundabout 1795.

ABBY:
Charles, the second is the one who had like, like two pronged wigs, right, and then really long.

MARKIEWICZ:
Yeah, that is, that was the height of it really the height of the big wigs, they were called periwigs. And they did, they had these big prongs at the front, and then two pieces down the front and a piece at the back very curly, a lot of hair, a lot of time and money goes into those. And it really does show that you are a very wealthy person, and you have a lot of time to look after your appearance.

MAGGIE:
How heavy are some of the big wigs?

MARKIEWICZ:
I mean, it’s hard to say. I can see from accounts of people who were buying and selling wigs that they would often be sold, the hair itself in its raw form would be sold by the pound. So that’s pretty heavy. I don’t know how much of a pound would go into making one particular wig. It’s very difficult to say, but I think we can say that some of those big ones would have been very heavy.

MAGGIE:
How tall were the tall wigs?

MARKIEWICZ:
So height was important for these in this in this early stage of the fashion. The taller the better, the bigger, the better. The bigger, the more expensive, the more time and effort goes goes into making and preparing the wig. We have to be a bit careful because there’s a lot of caricatures from that period. So a lot of cartoons that were deliberately produced to make fun out of people who put all that time and effort into frivolous fashions like wig wearing. So in some of those, you can see a hairdresser, literally up a ladder to get to the top of somebody’s wig to work on it. And we have to be a little bit careful about that it probably wasn’t quite that crazy. But there were certainly some areas of the fashion that did have very tall wigs. So a group called the macaroni who were young tended to be young men who really pushed the boundaries of fashion. A little bit like maybe punk rockers were, you know, in modern times they did, they wanted to look very different. And they wanted to look very out there. And one of the ways that they did that was through wearing very tall wigs.

MAGGIE:
How do you put a wig on?

MARKIEWICZ:
It’s attached to a piece of netting, or in those days it was attached to a piece of netting. So you would attach it, you would, it would sit on top of your head. In some cases, they would be tied behind the ears and around the back of the neck with a ribbon. And I always love I found one account if somebody have an older gentleman who would be able to tie have his wig tied on with the ribbon so tightly that it almost acted in the same way as giving him a bit of a facelift. He had it so tight it could pull pull back his skin at the temples and make him look younger.

MAGGIE:
How do you make a wig?

MARKIEWICZ:
Well, in those days, it was a very long process. It took a lot of time, it took a lot of expertise, hence why wigs initially anyway were very expensive. So it was there were lots of different processes that went into it. So first of all, they of course they had to find the hair. And I’d like I said that could be human hair. But some wig makers were a bit unscrupulous and would mix it with animal hair, and then sell it as though it was 100% human hair. So they did have to be a little bit careful about where the hair came from and how real it was. But what they would do is they would take packets of the hair and sort it by length and bind it together. And then that would be cleaned and processed. They would use a comb and iron comb attached to a stand to comb through the clumps of hair to make sure that there were no knots and try and get as much of the grease out as possible. Then they would curl the hair into wooden curlers or ceramic curlers. And in order to set that to make the curl stayed and they would bake it in an oven for a few hours. So quite often we can find accounts of wig makers who went into partnerships with local bakers and use their ovens at night. To cook the hair sometimes they would cook the hair in dough as well. And then once that was done, then it would be set up on a silk loom and woven together. And then you have the sort of strands of clean curled hair, which you can then attach to a net, using a mount in the shape of a head with with a needle and scissors, with needle and thread, and literally so each one on individually around the net. So it took a long time. Very painstaking process. And once that was done, and it was attached securely, using a ribbon, then around the edge of the netting, they could style the wig and cut it and shape it as they wanted. throughout that process, they would have to be working with the person that the wick was for. So they’d have to keep going back and checking the measurements and checking the style and having different fittings through the process.

MAGGIE:
What can go on a wig?

MARKIEWICZ:
Certainly I think for women’s fashions, things like fruit and flowers were quite common at that time and embellishing wigs or hairpieces was a big part of it. Less so for men, I think with men’s wigs, what they would tend to do is produce a particular style of wig that might celebrate something so particularly around battles and war. So if a particular campaign had gone well, somewhere, they would produce a wig with the name of that campaign that they people could then wear to be seen to be celebrating great battles and so on. But yes, embellishments definitely part of it for women, at least anyway. Although again, I think we have to be a bit careful though, again, some of the character chores do show some absolutely crazy over the top styles and boats and you know what, and somebody up a ladder trying to fit them all in. Possibly that was exceptional rather than the rule.

MAGGIE:
Why were some wigs powdered? doesn’t that get messy?

MARKIEWICZ:
It does seem a bit a bit revolting doesn’t it to us these days? I think we’re very used to our shampoos and conditioners and, and feeling our hair to be silky and smooth and not free. I think it was unlikely to be like that. In those days, I think they had a bit of a different idea about what clean hair looked like and felt like. So the powder was really to get rid of grease. So you could comb it through to get rid of grease, make the hair just a bit more manageable. That that’s how they would clean their hair really a lot of the time, they would also use powder for scent. So on the market, you can see in different advertisements for hairdressers that they would be selling an amazing range of powders with with all sorts of different citrus and fruit and flower smells. So something about making it smell nice as well. And yeah, I think it would definitely have got a bit messy. But you also see, particularly in the grand houses and in the hairdressing salons, those masks that they would put over their face. So when the powder is squirted on, their face is covered. So they don’t get it all over their, their clothes and in their eyes. And of course, people did use powder in their own hair as well, that became really quite common as a way to shape it and style it and keep it clean. So it was used completely across the board almost I suppose it’s as the equivalent of shampoo would be today. Of course, what happened gradually over the course of the century was that style changed. And so it became less acceptable to have this crazy over the top style and styles just did big generally start to become more simple, and a bit less formal and a bit less heavy. And I think that made it quite difficult then to keep up with wearing as part of that overall look. So it all started to become a lot more about being natural. And that meant, of course part of that is wearing your own natural hair and being a bit more in touch with nature than those very rigid structured styles that had been present earlier in the century.

MAGGIE:
Emma, thank you so much for talking to us today. I learned a lot, including the fact that I really don’t ever want to wear these kinds of wigs.

ABBY:
Totally agree.

MAGGIE:
Also, listeners, did you remember our quiz question choices: combing, sewing, and baking were all used in the construction of wigs.

ABBY:
So even though Emma told us that the most outlandish wigs we see in pictures are probably a little bit exaggerated, you can still design your own completely outlandish wig. The Victoria and Albert Museum in England has a little web app where you can build your own, including decorations like feathers, flowers and ships. Not kidding, you can really put a ship in your hair. There’s a link to this site in our show notes. That’s bigiftrue.abbymullen.org/wigs.

MAGGIE:
And that’s our show for today. Join us next time for another episode of Big If True!

ABBY:
Big if True is produced by me, Abby, and Maggie. Special thanks to our expert guest Emma Markiewicz. Our theme music is by Andrew Cote. Did you know you can buy a Big if True t shirt? The link is on our website. One more time that’s bigiftrue.abbymullen.org. Thanks everybody for listening

Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Show notes

  • Incidental music in today’s episode was:
  • Play around with making your own wig at the Victoria and Albert Museum!
Categories
Episodes

Saturn V

This week we’re launching into space! We’re learning all about the rocket that propelled astronauts all the way to the moon: the Saturn V. Our guest, Michael Neufeld of the National Air and Space Museum, tells us all about what these giant rockets are, what they do, and why we stopped using them.

Guest bio: Michael Neufeld

Michael J. Neufeld is a Senior Curator in the Space History Department of the National Air and Space Museum, where he is responsible for the rocket collection and for Mercury and Gemini spacecraft. He has written or edited nine books, notably The Rocket and the Reich (1995), Von Braun (2007) and Spaceflight: A Concise History (2018). In 2017 Secretary David Skorton gave him the Smithsonian Distinguished Scholar Award, the highest research award of the Institution.

Transcript

Speaker from Marshall Space Flight Center: The life of this stage in flight will be 2 and one half minutes. After it boosts the upper stages and the three astronauts in the Apollo spacecraft to 5000 miles an hour, at an altitude of 40 miles, the booster will be separated and discarded. The upper stages then take over the mission of sending the astronauts to the moon and to outer space. The five huge engines are next installed and checked out. During the test firing the outer four engines are gimbaled to test their capability for guiding the Saturn V during an actual flight. The test time has arrived, water is run through the flame deflector to prevent its melting 5.4.3.2.1. Ignition…

MAGGIE:
Whoa, this footage from the Marshall Space Flight Center is pretty amazing. I’m not so sure I’d be able to put myself on top of this huge rocket and launch into space.

ABBY:
Yeah, I think it really takes a special kind of person to be an astronaut in the 1960s and 70s the astronauts in NASA’s Apollo Program did just that on top of this huge rocket.

MAGGIE:
In the clip we just heard, NASA was testing the rocket that would eventually send the Apollo astronauts to space. It’s called the Saturn V and is the topic for today’s episode of

MAGGIE and ABBY:

Big if True,

MAGGIE:
where I, Maggie,

ABBY:
and I, Abby,

MAGGIE:
explore the truth about big things.

ABBY:
If you like Big if True, did you know you can subscribe to our newsletter? Then you can be notified when new episodes come out along with getting some extra fun stuff.

MAGGIE:
You can sign up for our newsletter at our website, bigiftrue.abbymullen.org.

ABBY:
Okay, back to the Saturn V.

North American Rockwell artist’s concept illustrating a phase of the scheduled Apollo 8 lunar orbit mission. Here, the Apollo 8 spacecraft Command and Service Modules (CSM), still attached to the Saturn V (S-IVB) third stage, heads for the moon at a speed of about 24,300 miles per hour. The trajectory, computed from the Saturn V’s third stage instrumentation unit, provides a “free return” to Earth around the moon. NASA image.

MAGGIE:
Here’s our quiz question to test your knowledge.

ABBY:
The last Saturn V rocket was launched in 1973. How many Saturn Vs were launched total into space?

MAGGIE:
A. 4, B. 13, C. 20, or D. 28.

ABBY:
We’ll tell you the answer near the end of the show.

MAGGIE:
Our guest today preserves and studies historical rockets for his job. We asked him lots of questions, including some suggested by you, our listeners.

NEUFELD:
Hi, I’m Michael Neufeld. I’m a senior curator at the National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution.

MAGGIE:
Thank you for talking to us. What is a rocket?

NEUFELD:
A rocket is basically something that can expel a mass, usually a gas, and propel itself through space. Mostly, we do that by burning two propellants. And those two propellants produce a hot gas that is expelled of the back of the rocket. But there, there are also other forms of rockets to in addition to that chemical rocket we’re so familiar with.

MAGGIE:
How did you get interested in rockets?

NEUFELD:
I grew up in the space race. So I was born 70 years ago, I was 10 years old when the first humans were launched into space in 1961. And so you know, I’m one of the people, a lot of them who got drawn into the whole idea of astronomy and space through the news of the space race.

MAGGIE:
That’s cool. What is the Saturn V?

NEUFELD:
The Saturn V was the giant rocket that NASA built to send astronauts to land on the moon. So it had one real purpose, which was to launch the astronauts in the Apollo spacecraft so that they could carry out the moon landing. Of course, that was in time for… President Kennedy’s deadline was the end of the 1960s. And so there was a real big rush on in the 1960s to build this huge rocket, get to the moon and beat the Soviets.

MAGGIE:
How big is it?

NEUFELD:
Saturn V is huge. I mean, it, when you stack it on the launch pad, it was 363 feet, about 111 meters tall. So really a significant size, that you can compare it to the Washington Monument, is it’s a significant fraction of the height of the Washington Monument.

Saturn V rocket, empty roads behind the rocket
The Saturn V rocket for the Apollo 11 mission. Flickr.

MAGGIE:
How heavy is it?

NEUFELD:
It was about six and a half million pounds when it was fully fueled on a launch pad. Almost all of that weight was propellant so it was pumped full of liquid propellant just before launch.

MAGGIE:
Why is it called Saturn V?

NEUFELD:
So the Saturn program started at the end of the 1950s. And it was part of again, the Space Race. You know, the sense of we got to catch up with the Soviets. Of course, they put the first satellite in space, Sputnik, in October 1957. Then they put a dog in orbit in November 1957. They went on so I could go on about this but bottom line, as we had to beat the Soviet, so we started by building a smaller, but still for that time very big rocket called Saturn. And then another version, the Saturn 1B. And Saturn V was essentially the fifth overall design for the Saturn series. Some of those numbers weren’t used, they were designs on paper that were thrown away. So Saturn V was the fifth major design in this Saturn rocket series.

MAGGIE:
One was Saturn V first built?

NEUFELD:
So as a result of Kennedy’s decision in 1961, that we want to send astronauts to land on the moon, they started working on how big a rocket would we need. And so it was designed in the early 60s; the first ones that were actually constructed were in 1966, 1967.

MAGGIE:
How did the builders put Saturn V together so that it would withstand being launched into space?

NEUFELD:
Well, of course, you know, it needs to be very strong, because you’ve got this huge force. In order to get a six and a half million pound rocket off the launch pad, you need more thrust in that to counteract Earth’s gravity. So it has seven and a half million pounds of thrust. And that, you had to construct these metal fuselage to be able to stand the huge forces on it as well as the aerodynamic forces of being, going through the lower atmosphere after it takes off.

REF: MSFC-67-IND-1200-56, SATURN V VEHICLE CONFIGURATION. NASA photo.

NEUFELD:

I have to explain the Saturn V is a three stage rocket. So it has three major sections. And as you, one of the propellant is used up in the first stage is thrown away. And then there’s propellant and then the second stage burns, and then it’s thrown away. And then the third stage burns and it puts the Apollo spacecraft in orbit. And then that third stage burns again to send the Apollo spacecraft to the moon. So it’s, you know, it’s made up of big sections called stages. So the first stage, which is the big one, that had seven and a half million pounds of thrust the one to lift it off the launch pad, that use liquid oxygen and kerosene. The upper stages, however, use liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen. So both of those are, have to be extremely cold liquids. And you take hydrogen and you, you cool it down till it’s 423 degrees below zero. And then you can turn hydrogen into a liquid. And oxygen needs to be 297 degrees below zero Fahrenheit. And these two cold liquids are contained in tanks in the upper stages of the rocket. And they’re brought together and burned. Of course hydrogen and oxygen make water so, so you actually, when you light a hydrogen oxygen rocket, a lot of what’s coming out of there is actually steam.

MAGGIE:
How much fuel does it take to launch?

NEUFELD:
So out of that six and a half million pounds at the launch pad, probably about five and a half to 6 million pounds is nothing but propellants. So you know, it’s basically a huge empty shell, that you fill up with these propellants, you know, that they’re pumped into the wall, the rocket on all each stage of the rocket is pumped into it before launch. And then then you light that, light it off and it goes up with stages in turn. So yeah, it’s mostly an empty shell when you’re, when it’s, when it’s sitting on the launch pad before it’s tanked up.

MISSION CONTROL:
T-minus nine. For main engineer start, for engines, [cross-talk, ignition sequence of Saturn V].

MAGGIE:
Where were the astronauts?

NEUFELD:
The astronauts were at the very nose of this thing near or very near the nose of this thing. So if you’ve seen them, I’m sure, you’ve looked at the picture of a Saturn five. On the very top is a little cone. That’s where the three astronauts sat. And above that cone, you see a tower that was actually a rocket to pull the astronauts away if the rocket was going to blow up. Go off course. You had a so called escape tower. It’s actually a solid propellant rocket on top of the thing, but pull that little cone capsule away. So so they sat in the main cabin, the so called command module of the Apollo spacecraft.

A technician can be seen working atop the white room across from the escape tower of the Apollo 11 spacecraft a few days prior to the launch of the Saturn V moon rocket.
A technician can be seen working atop the white room across from the escape tower of the Apollo 11 spacecraft a few days prior to the launch of the Saturn V moon rocket. The towering 363-foot Saturn V was a multi-stage, multi-engine launch vehicle standing taller than the Statue of Liberty. Altogether, the Saturn V engines produced as much power as 85 Hoover Dams. NASA photo.

MAGGIE:
What does it feel like to be launched into space on a rocket?

NEUFELD:
Well, I mean, it was certainly exciting. And incredibly noisy, especially the first stage of the rocket, and in the atmosphere where you still had a atmosphere to transmit sound. So sound came all the way through the structure of the rocket. And also, you know, through the air as you’ll be bouncing around. So it was extremely loud and noisy and, and jittery, in the first part of the launch, so the astronauts almost have a hard time seeing their instruments during the early part. In the later parts of the launch, they say it was extremely smooth.

Apollo astronauts and mission control:
Magnificent, right, Roger 11, we’ll pass that on. And it certainly looks like you’re well on your way. Now. We have no complaints with any of the three stages. That right here we copy, no transited staging of any significance that we’re at, right.

NEUFELD:
And when they got into space, the noise decreased, and then they, and then it was very sort of more a distant rumble. Of course, another factor in this is you are being accelerated. So if you’re being accelerated, that means you have G forces port pushing down on you. So you know, during the launch, you could have the force of three to five times the Earth’s gravity pressing you into your seat, which was actually a lot better than the earlier astronaut launches, where they used smaller rockets and went faster and the G forces are even bigger. But yeah, you had to, you had to be able to withstand this force on you, it’s like a huge weight on your chest as the acceleration of the rocket pushes you into your seat. Now when the rocket stops, you suddenly go weightless. So just like that, you go from several G’s pressing down on you to weightless instantaneously when the rocket shuts off. Because now you’re in freefall, you’re actually essentially free falling through space. So for the astronauts it was often rather, is a very sudden transition.

MAGGIE:
What happens to the rocket once it separates from the payload?

NEUFELD:
So each stage is thrown away in turn. So the first and second stages, they end up re-entering the atmosphere and then crashing into the ocean. So it’s a throwaway rocket. Only recently have we begun to do more with recovering the stages of rockets and reusing them, the whole thing was a throwaway. So and the third stage, the last stage, the one that propelled the astronauts spacecraft to the moon, that was on the moon trajectory with them. And they usually, especially with the later launches, they directed it to crash into the moon, so they could create an artificial moon quake. So after the first crews had planted seismometers, so like earthquake measuring devices on the moon, they crashed their last rocket stage into the moon to try to create an artificial moon quake.

MAGGIE:
Who picks up the stages in the water?

NEUFELD:
The stages are lost. I mean, they go they crash they are they are maybe destroyed on the way down by aerodynamic forces and they they sink to the bottom of the ocean. And in fact, just a few years ago, Amazon owner Jeff Bezos paid 10s of millions of dollars to recover parts of the engines of the first stage of some of the Saturn Vs so we now own some pieces of Apollo 11’s Saturn V first stage engines and that gives us a better sense of what happened so yeah, there might have been that huge stage of the rocket the first, the first third or so of the rocket probably some pieces broke off when it was falling back in the atmosphere. And then it crashed into the ocean which completely destroyed it and some basically metal pieces sank to the bottom of the ocean. And the parts we could find, the parts he could find were basically the heavy parts of the engines because they were survived the impact more intact than some of the other parts. The tanks are like, I mean, that when that when those rocket is discarded those tanks are like gigantic beer empty beer cans, you just got this huge aluminum cylinder and it’s empty and it doesn’t have a whole lot of strength. So you know pretty much got, you know, smashed to pieces when it hit the water.

MAGGIE:
Did anything bad ever happened during the Saturn V rocket?

NEUFELD:
Saturn V had an incredibly good safety record, nothing ever bad happened to astronauts on a flight. The second test of the Saturn V had a bunch of problems. So this happened in April 1968. And the engine shut down and they had a hard time, they could not restart the third stage engine for a test. So this was an unmanned–uncrewed test. And they had a bunch of technical problems, but nothing ever, you know, went seriously bad. None blew up, which was kind of a very pleasant surprise, because if you look back to the late 50s, and the early 60s, when rocket technology was a little more new, or especially this huge, this new giant rockets were being built during the, for the Cold War for the nuclear arms race and for, for the space race, a lot of them went crazy blew up, crashed, were blown up. They were like it was a guy on the ground. There’s a range safety officer who was responsible for pressing the button to the blow up the rocket if it was going off course. All of this stuff could happen. But Saturn V was virtually perfect.

MAGGIE:
How many Saturn Vs were launched altogether?

NEUFELD:
13 Saturn Vs were launched from November ’67 to May 1973. Of course the first launches were development launches, try to just get understand the rocket. And then with the third launch, they launched the the Apollo 8 astronauts to the moon in December 1968. And then Apollo 11 was the first landing on the moon. And then, then of course, there were several landings. So there were six landings on the moon with Apollo 11, to Apollo 17. And one failure that was Apollo 13. As a movie you may want to watch or have seen maybe. So there were seven times landed in the moon, six of them worked, one of them failed. And then there was one last launch of a Saturn five. In 1973, a special two stage version of the Saturn V launched the Skylab space station, the Skylab space station was actually an outfitted third stage. And so instead of having propellant inside this third stage, it had a living area, you know, for the astronauts and had like solar panels attached to it and things so that last launch of the Saturn V put Skylab into orbit.

MAGGIE:
Why did NASA stop using them?

NEUFELD:
Well, I think two reasons or two related reasons. Number one, it was extremely expensive. So it was, you know, a billion dollars every time you wanted to launch one. And it was built specifically for the moon landings and the United States lost interest in going to the moon, clear and simple. The public didn’t want to support it. The public was no longer interested in spending the money on NASA moon landings and although NASA managed to have enough money to land on the moon six times, there was no more support for Apollo beyond that.

MAGGIE:
Did you catch the answer to our quiz question? There were 13 Saturn Vs, launched from 1967 to 1973.

ABBY:
If you want to see a Saturn V rocket today, Mike told us that you have a few options to see a deconstructed one: the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the Space and Rocket Center in Alabama, or the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas. By the way, that’s the Houston in the recording we played earlier from Apollo 11’s launch.

MAGGIE:
Houston, we’ve had a problem

ABBY:
exactly, only that’s from Apollo 13.

MAGGIE:
Today if you want to go to space, you’ll have to hitch a ride on a Russian rocket or fly on SpaceX. But the Saturn V will always be the very first rocket to get a person to the moon. Thank you, Mike for telling us all about these huge rockets. That’s our show for this week.

ABBY:
Have a great semester, everybody, and we’ll see you next time on another episode of

MAGGIE:
Big if True.

ABBY:
Big if True is produced by me, Abby, and MAGGIE: . Special thanks to our expert guest NEUFELD:. To learn more about him, check out our show notes at bigiftrue.abbymullen.org. Our theme music is by Andrew Cote. And special thanks to NASA and the Marshall Space Flight Center, the source of the recordings that you heard of the Saturn V launches. Thanks to everybody who sent in questions for this episode. I hope you got the answers you were looking for. And even if you didn’t, thanks for listening.

Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Categories
Episodes

Airships

Airships are giant balloons with engines! They’ve been used for recreation, espionage, defense, and more. Our guest Brett Holman tells us about these giant airborne vehicles, and what happens when people get a little bit too paranoid about them…

Guest bio: Brett Holman

Dr Brett Holman is a historian from Melbourne, Australia, graduating with a PhD in history from the University of Melbourne in 2009 and then teaching history at the University of New England (Australia). He researches and writes about what people thought and felt about aviation in Britain, Australia and New Zealand in the early 20th century – from fearing a “knock-out blow from the air” to enjoying the spectacle of flight as entertainment. Brett’s first book, The Next War in the Air: Britain’s Fear of the Bomber, 1908-1941, was published in 2014, and he has been blogging at Airminded since 2005: https://airminded.org.

Categories
Episodes

Olympics

The Tokyo 2020(1) Olympics are starting! So we wanted to find out a little more about what the Olympics are, and why they work the way they do. We talk to Dr. Matt Hodler, a historian of sport, to learn more about this big sporting event.

Guest bio: Matt Hodler

Matt Hodler is an Assistant Professor in Sport Media & Communication at the University of Rhode Island.

Categories
Episodes

Fireworks

In this special July 4-themed episode, we’re talking about a staple of many people’s Independence Day celebration: giant explosions! Whether you love fireworks or hate them, you’ll learn something about where they come from and how they’re made with our expert Simon Werrett!

Guest bio

Simon Werrett teaches the History of Science at University College London. He taught at the University of Washington, Seattle from 2002 to 2012. He is the author of Fireworks: Pyrotechnic Arts and Sciences in European History (2010) and Thrifty Science: Making the Most of Materials in the History of Experiment (2019).

Transcript

ABBY:
Hey Maggie, when you think about the Fourth of July, what do you think about?

MAGGIE:
I’m definitely going out to the Workhouse and sitting down on the yard, in the grass. It’s pretty fun. And then watching the fireworks, even though it’s pretty loud.

ABBY:
So what does it feel like when you see a huge fireworks display?

MAGGIE:
Well, it feels like, how is it that sparkly? Or how’s it that bright? But also, how is it not killing us all? It’s really loud.

ABBY:
How loud?

MAGGIE:
Like your eardrums are being split apart loud.

ABBY:
Also, I feel like you can almost feel the concussion from the explosion in your whole body, if you’re close enough.

MAGGIE:
Yes. I have a feeling that fireworks aren’t just for the Fourth of July though. So I think that maybe you should take a closer look at fireworks On today’s episode of

MAGGIE AND ABBY:
Big if True!

MAGGIE:
Where I, Maggie,

ABBY:
And I, Abby,

MAGGIE:
explore the truth about big things. Today we’re talking about giant beautiful explosions in the sky, though not all fireworks are big. So here’s our quiz question to test your knowledge.

ABBY:
One of the most well known references to fireworks in the United States is in our national anthem, where we sing about “the rockets’ red glare and the bombs bursting in air.” During what war was the national anthem written?

MAGGIE:
A. The Civil War; B. The American Revolution; C. The First Seminole War; or D. The War of 1812?

ABBY:
We’ll tell you the answer near the end of the show.

MAGGIE:
Our expert today has written a whole book about the history of fireworks.

WERRETT:
My name is Simon Werrett. And I am a professor in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at the University College in London in the UK.

MAGGIE:
Thank you for talking to us today, Simon. To start off, what is a firework?

WERRETT:
That’s a great question. It changes over time, and fireworks have a very long history. So there’s been lots of different kinds. But I think the key thing is that they use gunpowder to create some kind of effect. So gunpowder is charcoal, saltpeter, sulfur; you mix them up, and it creates– it doesn’t actually, it doesn’t detonate, it doesn’t explode, but it burns very, very quickly. And depending on how you control that burning, you can produce power, and that can be used to drive a firework. So you have different kinds. You’ve got rockets, for example, everyone knows rocket fly up in the air and explode. And you’ve got fountains, so you have big plumes of sparks that come out the top of the firework which you stick in the ground. You’ve got wheels, so they don’t– you don’t see those so much these days. But we used to have Catharine wheels, which are a firework that spins around, you nail it to a post, and then it spins around and shoots out sparks. And they might have different effects, different colors, different sounds, they make cracks and bangs. I think everyone’s familiar with them. So there’s lots of different kinds. But the core thing is that is that use of gunpowder to make some kind of special effect.

MAGGIE:
When were fireworks invented?

WERRETT:
Unfortunately, it’s really hard to say because, roughly speaking, you’re looking at between about the ninth and the twelfth century, is when gunpowder is invented, discovered, if you like, and then by about the 13th century, so the 1200s, you have records that are probably fireworks. And, as probably everyone knows, the place where that happens is in China. So you start to see people talking about fireworks as being used in celebrations in China. And then over time they spread across the world. They end up in Europe in the 14th century, in the US in the 17th century. The problem is that the Chinese word for fireworks are the same as the Chinese words for colored smoke or colored powder. So they were making effects for festivals with colored smoke and powder. And then gradually gunpowder replaced those. But because the language didn’t change, you can’t tell when it moved to gunpowder. It’s not very clear. So so we know it’s it’s really ancient, they’re really old. But it’s really hard to actually kind of put your finger on and say the in that date is when they started using fireworks.

MAGGIE:
How did the fireworks become something that we associate with celebration?

WERRETT:
Well, they were always used to celebrate. So I think you can go all the way back to the really earliest records of kind of medieval Chinese fireworks. And they were used for things like celebrating the new year. And, and for a very long time, they had two big uses. So they were used for celebrations, in festivals and rituals and performances, these are in the theater as well. And then they also use them in war, military fireworks. So things like grenades and bombs were considered to be fireworks and, and rockets as well, actually. So they’ve always had that; they’ve always been used for both, but but that celebratory way of using them goes back to the very, very beginning. There’s something kind of just spectacular about seeing fireworks. So I think probably straightaway, people thought they could, they could be used in that way.

MAGGIE:
Is celebration the only thing they’ve been used for?

WERRETT:
As I say, they they got used in war so so there’s a nice old print of a, of a pyrotechnician that was made in the Renaissance. And it says at the top of it “arte at marte.” And that’s Latin for art and war. And on the, on the one side of the picture, you see all the implements of warfare that includes bombs and grenades and rockets that you’d fire at your enemy in a battle. And on the other side, you’ve got sort of peaceful versions of all those fireworks, which you would then use for celebrating the victory when you triumphed over your, over your enemies. And sometimes fireworks were recreations of battles. Pity the poor soldiers, they had to fight the real battle. And then they went home. And then they had to do it all over again in a kind of mock display for the, for their king, or lead. And then they did it with pretend fireworks with ones that wouldn’t cause any any harm. But fireworks have also been used for lots of other things. So in the 19th century, for example, there was a big, there was lots of efforts to invent new ways of using fireworks. So for example, they came up with life saving rockets. And it’s a pretty simple idea. But you wonder why no one had thought of it before. But you know, if you stick a line, a rope on the, on a rocket, and then you see someone out at sea, who’s struggling in a boat to maybe in a storm, you can fire the rocket out and get the line to them, and then tow them back into, into the, onto the beach. And they use them for signals. So when you make a map, you use a process called triangulation to figure out where everything is on the map. And to do that, you have to have signals that you can see from a long way away. And so they use rockets as the, as the signals. And you’ve probably seen people firing up flares, to signal that they maybe they’re in danger. And that is a firework, essentially. So So there have been lots of different, different uses for them. And I think people are always kind of inventing new ways to use fireworks over over time.

MAGGIE:
Is it dangerous to make fireworks?

WERRETT:
It’s a very good question. And the answer is definitely yes. So really, really incredibly dangerous stuff, gunpowder. You got to be super careful with it. And the thing that you have to really really watch out for is that you don’t produce any sparks when you work with it, because you might accidentally set the gunpowder off, and then it can explode. So if you look at how gunpowder was made, and how fireworks are made, you can see that the places where they make them are very, very special. Few years ago, I went to a wonderful place in Wilmington, Delaware, called Brandywine Creek. And there is an old gunpowder factory that was set up in 1801 by a French gentleman called Monsieur DuPont. And the DuPont Chemical Corporation has its origins in that family. And you can still see the gunpowder factory as it was in about 1800. And so they made gunpowder in buildings that were all set up along the river. And what they did is the side of the building that’s facing onto the river is made with wood, or it doesn’t have, it doesn’t have a side and then everything else is stone. So if somebody accidentally blew up the gunpowder all the debris would shoot out over the river and not into the rest of the factory, which is where it might set off even more gunpowder; then you have a real disaster. And all the buildings are very separated. Spread out. And they had to make them so they didn’t have any nails in the floor because the, if you had hobnail boots with, with metal in them, and you stood on a nail, you might produce a spark that could set fire to the gunpowder. So it’s all really, really carefully thought out. And the other thing that they did is they had to make fireworks and gunpowder a long way away from any towns, because if your gunpowder factory blew up, then you know lots of people could get good get hurt. And unfortunately, before the 19th century, lots of people did make fireworks and gunpowder in towns. And they, there were awful accidents. And sometimes, because I’m a historian of fireworks, one of the ways I know about people in the past who who made fireworks is because their, their house blew up. They made a mistake and the house blew up. And then they put a notice in the newspaper The next day. And then that’s how you know that they were there. And there’s no other records of them. So so it’s not very good for them. It was good for historians, it was not so good for the for the people who made them.

MAGGIE:
What makes fireworks colorful?

WERRETT:
Well, the chemical answer is that you have two ingredients that you need for that to happen to have colored fireworks. One of them is this is a substance called potassium chlorate, which is a chemical that has lots of oxygen in it. And so it lets your firework burn at a higher temperature than other kinds of fireworks. And if you add metal salts to the gunpowder mixture made with potassium chlorate, then the metal salts burn with that extra oxygen and then they produce colors. So potassium chloride is a horrible substance talking about accidents. So it’s very, very volatile, which means that it’s really hard to handle without it exploding. So the person that discovered it guy called Berthollet in the, in the 1780s. He did some experiments with it, and it blew up. And it caused catastrophe. So said, Okay, don’t do that anymore. But after about 30 years, people figured out how to make it a bit more stable. And then they started adding it to fireworks. So this is in the 1820s. And the first person who actually recorded fireworks made with this substance was in Philadelphia, in I think, in 1822, a guy called James Cutbush. And what he did is he put this potassium chlorate in his fireworks mixture. And then he added what he called nitrate of strontium. So basically a metal, a salt of a metal. And when you burned the firework, when you set it off, it produced a really nice glowing red flame. And after that, people use different kinds of salts to produce the colors. So if you use barium chloride, you get green. If you use sodium nitrate, you get yellow. If you use copper chloride, you get blue. So you add those salts, and that’s what gives you that intense color. So that’s the chemical answer to your question. But there’s also a kind of historical answer, because first of all, people have always thought that fireworks were colored. So if you look much earlier in the 16th, 17th century, people say, “Oh, yeah, our fireworks are colored.” And chemists say, well, they can’t have been colored because they didn’t know about potassium chlorate. They didn’t know about metal salts. But of course, you know, fire is colorful. So people saw in even in just the kind of natural color of fire, there’s reds and yellows, and blues and white, so, so people thought they were colorful, all the way through. But there was this moment, in the early 19th century, when people use chemistry to add color to the fireworks and ever since then they’ve got more and more chemicals to use and brighter and different kinds of color. So So what we see today is is very, very kind of techni-color fireworks compared to what people saw in the past.

MAGGIE:
What makes fireworks in all those cool shapes?

WERRETT:
That is another bit of clever engineering. And this goes back all the way back to that idea that fireworks were originally used for war and peace. So one of the things that people used to do was they used to fire something that looked like a cannonball from from a mortar. So it’s a bit like a cannon that’s facing upwards. And you put your cannonball in it, and then you shoot it at the enemy. And the cannonball is called a shell and the fireworks too. Kind of a nice, peaceful, playful version of that, is that you you, you make a tube and you put a big globe of wooden paper filled with gunpowder inside it, and you put it in the tube, and then you shoot it out the tube. And it goes up in the air very, very high, and then explodes. And all of the contents fan out into the sky. So what they do is they make a shell. And they put little pellets of gunpowder into the shell. And they’re called stars. And when the, when the shell gets as high as it’s going to go, there’s a little fuse, that sets it off, it explodes and all the shells fly out. So when you see the big spray of fire coming out in the sky, what you’re seeing is all those little pellets, shooting out from inside the shell. And then, depending on how you organize your pellet in the shell, you get different shapes. So if you arrange them as a little smiley face, or a heart shape, then when it explodes, it will shoot them out. And as they light up, they’ll produce a heart shape or a smiley face. It’s pretty hard to do. I think people have only been been putting those kinds of shapes in, in the last 20-30 years.

MAGGIE:
What’s the coolest fireworks display you’ve ever seen?

WERRETT:
Well, there’s so many different kinds of fireworks. And I’ve, I’ve studied the history for a long time. So I’ve I’ve seen stories about fireworks displays, hundreds and hundreds of fireworks displays. So so it’s quite hard to pick a favorite. But there is one that I thought is really impressive. And I’d love to know how they did it. So if you go on the internet, there is a website and it shows old news clips from, going all the way back to the beginning of the last century. And there’s a little there’s a little video, a little film that was made in the 1920s of a fireworks display, which they did at Crystal Palace, which is a big kind of garden in South London, quite near where I, where I grew up. And one of the fireworks that they do there is basically an animation of elephants made with fireworks. So if you’re standing on the ground, watching what you see, and it’s nighttime, it’s all completely dark. And then suddenly, you see the outline of an elephant made with fireworks with like little lights of little kind of pyrotechnic light. And then it walks across a field. And it’s really impressive. It’s really amazing. And you think, how did they do that in 1920, 1922. And what they had, presumably, was a big framework with hundreds and hundreds of little firework fire lights on it. And they lit them in or in an order that would make it seem like an elephant was walking across the field. And the elephant kind of raises its trunk and, and it’s really impressive. It’s really good. I’d love to see that today. So that’s one that always sticks in my mind.

ABBY:
Fireworks also show up in many important events in the history of the United States. In fact, they’re in our national anthem.

Pen and ink colored etching of Ft McHenry, with bombs launching from ships in the harbor onto the Fort.
John Bower, “A view of the bombardment of Fort McHenry, near Baltimore, by the British fleet.” New York Public Library.

WERRETT:
That’s the rockets’ red glare. So that comes from the War of 1812 between the British and the Americans, shortly after independence, and the rockets that, that’s referring to are Congreve rockets. There’s a guy in London, whose father was the head of Woolwich Arsenal, which is where the British built basically, where they made fireworks in the 18th, 19th century. And he’d seen– British troops in India had seen that the Indian troops used war rockets that were really big, and very, very powerful. And they kind of, they were real, really tough to fight against. So what Congreve did is he said, Well, maybe I can make a version of those rockets. And then the British can use those initially to fight the French. And so he made these gigantic rockets, like, including the stick, they’re 30 feet long. So they’re really big, and they’re made with an iron body, and you fill it up with gunpowder. You put an explosive in the cap in the head. And then you– what they originally did is they use them to blow up French ships in the English Channel. And then they took them to America, to North America, and they use them in that battle. So they were firing volleys of Congreve rockets. And that’s the rocket that has the red glare in the, in the national anthem.

MAGGIE:
Hey, there’s the answer to our quiz question. The National Anthem, otherwise known as the “Star Spangled Banner,” was written by Francis Scott Key during the Battle of Fort McHenry in the War of 1812.

ABBY:
We’ve included in our show notes a few art pieces from the War of 1812 that show the bombs bursting in air and the rockets’ red glare. And we’ve also linked to a few more stories about the Congreve rockets. You can check those out at bigiftrue.abbymullen.org.

MAGGIE:
And that’s it for today’s show. As you go watch fireworks for the Fourth of July, or maybe you shoot off a few yourself, think about all the ways that fireworks are Big if True!

ABBY:
Big if True is produced by me, Abby, and Maggie. Special thanks to our expert guest, Simon Werrett. Our theme music is by Andrew Cote. Make sure you check out our show notes at bigiftrue.abbymullen.org for lots of fun extras, and Happy Fourth of July.

More info

  • Special thanks to the U.S. Air Force Bands’ public domain music for all the patriotic music in this episode!
Categories
Episodes

Aida

In this episode of Big If True, we travel to ancient Egypt—or a fictional version of ancient Egypt, which is the setting for Aida, an opera by Giuseppe Verdi. Today we’re talking to Steven White about this grand opera, and what it takes to make such a production. This episode is for you even if you don’t know anything about opera, or you think you don’t like opera!

Guest bio: Steven White

Portrait of Steven White

Praised by Opera News as a conductor who “squeezes every drop of excitement and pathos from the score,” Steven White is one of North America’s premiere operatic and symphonic conductors. He made his acclaimed Metropolitan Opera debut in 2010, conducting performances of La traviata starring Angela Gheorghiu. Since then he has conducted a number of Metropolitan Opera performances of La traviata, with such stars as Natalie Dessay, Hei-Kyung Hong, Plácido Domingo, Thomas Hampson, Dmitri Hvorostovksy and Matthew Polenzani. In the past several seasons he has returned to the Met to participate in critically fêted productions of Don Carlo, Billy Budd, The Rake’s Progress and Elektra.

With a vibrant repertoire of over sixty-five titles, Maestro White’s extensive operatic engagements have included performances with New York City OperaL’Opera de MontréalVancouver OperaOpera ColoradoPittsburgh OperaMichigan Opera TheaterBaltimore OperaNew Orleans Opera, and many others. In recent seasons he has conducted Rigoletto with San Diego OperaOtellowith Austin OperaLa traviata with Utah Opera, and a world premiere staged production of a brand-new Bärenreiter edition of Gounod’s Faust with Opera Omaha. In 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the cancellation of his eleventh production at Arizona OperaAriadne auf Naxos,as well as the company premiere of André Previn’s A Streetcar Named Desire at Opera Roanoke.Projects moving forward in the 2020-21 season COVID-impacted season include a reimagined Rigoletto with Tulsa Opera at Tulsa’s ONEOK Field, and Le nozze di Figaro in a return to Opera Omaha.

Music critics are effusive in their praise of conductor Steven White’s ability to elicit inspired music-making from orchestras. Of his 2016 performances with the Omaha Symphony, the Omaha World-Herald asserts that, “it would be hard to imagine a more complete performance of the Symphonie Fantastique. Highly nuanced, tightly controlled and crisp, Steven White asked everything from orchestra members and they were flawless. He led them out of serene beauty into disturbing dissonance and even to the terrifying point of musical madness without ever losing control. It was insanely good.” Opera News declares, “White is amazing: he consistently demands and gets the absolute best playing from the orchestra.”

Among the many orchestras Maestro White has conducted are the Metropolitan Opera Orchestra, the Moscow Philharmonic, the Orchestre Métropolitain du Grand Montréal, the Mozarteum und Salzburg Kulturvereinigung Orchestra, the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra, the New World Symphony Orchestra, the Spoleto Festival Orchestra, the Colorado Symphony, the Nashville Symphony Orchestra, the Columbus Symphony Orchestra, the Charleston Symphony, the Florida Philharmonic, the Fort Worth Symphony and London’s Philharmonia Orchestra for a CHANDOS recording of arias featuring his wife, soprano Elizabeth Futral. In 2019 he made debuts with the San Diego Symphony, the Utah Symphony Orchestra and the Williamsburg Symphony Orchestra.

Maestro White is a passionate and dedicated educator. He has served multiple artistic residencies and led productions at such institutions as the Peabody Conservatory of MusicIndiana University, the College Conservatory of Music at the University of Cincinnati, the University of Miami Frost School of Music Program in SalzburgKennesaw State University and Virginia Tech University. In the summer of 2019 he served as an artist in residence at the Shanghai Conservatory in China and in 2020 he led a critically acclaimed production of La clemenza di Tito for the North Carolina School of the Arts Fletcher Opera Institute. He is in constant demand as an adjudicator of the most prestigious music and vocal competitions, including numerous auditions for the Metropolitan Opera National Council and the Jensen Foundation.

Steven White proudly makes his home in Virginia, where he serves as Artistic Director of Opera Roanoke, a company with which he has been associated for two decades. Maestro White has conducted dozens of productions in Roanoke, including performances of Das Lied von der ErdeDer fliegende HolländerFidelioFalstaffOtelloMacbethAidaHänsel und Gretel and many others. In recognition of his contributions to the civic, cultural and artistic life of Southwest Virginia, Roanoke College conferred on Maestro White an Honorary Doctorate of Fine Arts in May 2013.

(From Fletcher Artists)

Categories
News

Summer Interview Extravanganza!

Big If True was started during pandemic online school, and even though online school wasn’t awesome, it did give us some flexibility in terms of interview scheduling. But in the fall, both of our cohosts will be back in school in person, so we’re trying to get a big jump on interviews this summer! If we’re not able to get a big queue of interviews, then Big If True might have to go on permanent hiatus in the fall.

We’ve also been having a lot of difficulty getting experts to respond when we reach out to them cold. We really rely on our networks and listeners to help us find amazing experts! So we’re asking for your help again to help us schedule a lot of interviews this summer.

Below, we’ve listed the topics that we would love to talk about on Big If True. If you are an expert on any of these topics, and you’d be willing to talk to us, will you please fill out the form at the bottom of this post? Or if you are an expert on something BIG that isn’t on our list, we’d love to hear from you in the form as well. Then we’ll be in touch. We’re especially looking for women and people of color!

Here are some of the things we want to talk about.

Science

  • Albatrosses
  • Mt. Everest
  • International Space Station
  • Irish elk (fossils!)
  • Arapaima (<- ok, actually Abby’s the one who really wants to talk about this)
  • Jupiter
  • Mamenchisaurus
  • Mammoth Cave (or a non-US cave!)

History(ish)

  • Great Wall of China
  • Ottoman Empire
  • Jefferson’s Mammoth Cheese
  • Burj Khalifa
  • Tacoma Narrows Bridge

Literature and Culture

  • The Death Star

So if you can help us out, please reach out! We are fun to talk to, and you’ll get to spread your message to kids around the country!

Categories
Episodes

World War II

In today’s episode, we’re talking about World War II on Memorial Day weekend. We don’t have time to talk about even a fraction of the war, so we’re just touching on a few topics that we’re interested in about how American soldiers got to the front.

Guest bio: Kim Guise

Kimberly Guise is a Curator and Assistant Director for Curatorial Services at The National WWII Museum. She holds a BA in German and Judaic Studies from the University of Massachusetts Amherst. She also studied at the Universität Freiburg in Germany and holds a masters in Library and Information Science (MLIS) from Louisiana State University. Kim is fluent in German, reads Yiddish, and specializes in the American prisoner-of-war experience in World War II. After working at the National Yiddish Book Center in Amherst, Massachusetts, she began working at The National WWII Museum in 2008, where she has since facilitated the acquisition of thousands of artifacts, led numerous Museum tours, and curated several exhibits including Guests of the Third Reich: American POWs in Europe. (from the National World War II Museum website)

Categories
Episodes

La Soufriere

Volcanoes are really big and really dangerous! Right now, one volcano in a big chain of volcanoes in the Caribbean is erupting. It’s called La Soufriere de Saint Vincent. We talked to Charlie Mandeville of the US Geological Survey’s Volcano Hazards Program about La Soufriere, and about volcanoes more generally.

Guest bio: Charlie Mandeville

Charles Mandeville is the Program Coordinator for the USGS Volcano Hazards Program (VHP) at USGS Headquarters in Reston, Virginia. He has been Program Coordinator for the Volcano Hazards Program since Sept. 2012. He was trained as a physical volcanologist and geochemist and has conducted research at the following volcanoes in his career, including Krakatau, and Galunggung in Indonesia, Mt. St. Helens in Washington, Crater Lake in Oregon and Augustine volcano in Alaska.  His Ph.D. research focused on all aspects of the Krakatau 1883 eruption in Indonesia and involved the study of both onshore and offshore submarine samples from that eruption in order to characterize the erupted material and to delineate the likely cause of lethal tsunamis generated during the eruption that resulted in over 36,000 fatalities. 

He now manages the USGS’ s Volcano Hazards Program (VHP) that operates volcano observatories in Hawaii, Alaska, Cascadia, California and Yellowstone, and the Volcano Disaster Assistance Program (in partnership with the US Agency for International Development), and supporting research and assistance projects. He develops the program’s science portfolio and capabilities and strategies and corresponding budget plans. He coordinates USGS volcano monitoring with the efforts of cooperative university and state geological survey partners. He represents the USGS VHP on interagency and international committees and meetings and advocates the importance of national volcano monitoring to members of Congress.

Categories
Episodes

Ever Given

Did you hear the story about the ship that got stuck in the Suez Canal? Did you find the story super confusing because it seemed so improbable? Today’s episode is about the Ever Given, the ship that got stuck in the Suez Canal at the end of March. Our expert, Sal Mercogliano, talks us through what container ships are, why they’re so important, and what in the world happened to the Ever Given!

Guest Bio

Sal Mercogliano is an Associate Professor of History and Chair of the History, Criminal Justice and Political Science Department at Campbell University.  He is a former merchant mariner and has a BS in Marine Transportation from SUNY Maritime College, an MA in Maritime History and Nautical Archaeology from East Carolina University and a Ph.D. in Military and Naval History from the University of Alabama.

css.php